Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42301231›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

AI-Physics-Experiment Trinity for Integrated Protein Dynamics Modeling.

Chen Shi, Minying Low, Peng Xiu, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, Yong Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chen ShiCollege of Life Sciences & Department of Engineering Mechanics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Minying LowCollege of Life Sciences & Department of Engineering Mechanics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Peng XiuCollege of Life Sciences & Department of Engineering Mechanics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Kresten Lindorff-LarsenLinderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Yong WangCollege of Life Sciences & Department of Engineering Mechanics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

National Science Foundation of China 12174337National Science Foundation of China 32371300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins exist as conformational ensembles, with dynamic transitions governing biological processes. Deciphering these dynamics demands integrating experimental data, physics-based simulations, and artificial intelligence (AI)-each with distinct strengths and limitations. Experiments deliver direct structural and dynamic benchmarks but are often constrained by insufficient spatiotemporal resolution or difficulties with providing information on transiently and weakly populated states. Physics-based methods may generate atomic-scale trajectories via force fields yet face sampling bottlenecks, force field sensitivity, and the curse of dimensionality. AI, particularly deep learning and generative modeling approaches, facilitates the efficient prediction of protein structures and conformational ensembles, as well as dimensionality reduction, yet is hindered by limited interpretability and transferability, and a scarcity of high-quality ground-truth data for training and benchmarking models of dynamics. This review outlines core principles of standalone approaches and highlights integrative strategies: experimental constraints guide physics-driven refinement; AI enhances experimental processing and ensemble generation; physics imparts plausibility to AI, while AI accelerates simulation sampling and force field optimization. We elaborate on this synergy, emphasizing physics-based modeling's glue-like role in reconciling heterogeneous datasets. Finally, we summarize persistent challenges and discuss future directions for integrated modeling of protein dynamics.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMolecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsHumansProtein ConformationProteinsgenerative AIintegrative structural biologyMD simulationsprotein dynamicsprotein ensemble modeling

Identifiers

PMID42301231
PMCPMC13336489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.