ArticleIranian biomedical journal2026
Antiviral Potential of Lipopeptide Biosurfactant Isolated from Acinetobacter junii B6.
Article in Iranian biomedical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Influenza A virus (IAV) is a global health concern, increasing the exploration of alternative therapeutics. Biosurfactants (BSs) are biodegradable, non-toxic biomolecules with favorable biological activities. Acinetobacter junii B6, known for utilizing crude oil as a carbon and energy source, produces BSs. This study evaluated the antiviral potential of the lipopeptide biosurfactant (LPB) against H1N1/A/PR8/34 infection. Methods: A. junii B6 LPB was extracted and characterized in our previous study. The 50% cytotoxic concentration and non-cytotoxic concentration (NCTC), defined as the concentration with no toxicity on cells, were determined by the MTT assay on MDCK cells. The NCTC was exposed to the cells in the presence of PR8 (100 TCID50) under simultaneous, pre- and post-exposure combination treatments for 1 h. After 48 h of incubation, the hemagglutination and MTT assays assessed viral propagation and cell protection, respectively. Amantadine and oseltamivir served as antiviral control drugs. Results: The extracted LPB caused a 1 log2 reduction in pre- and post-exposure treatments, whereas amantadine and oseltamivir reduced viral titers by more than 1 log2. Cell protection was favorable in all combination treatments except for LPB co-treatment. LPB extract showed limited but notable anti-IAV activity, alongside cell protection. Conclusion: While LPB is less potent than amantadine and oseltamivir, its non-toxic and environmentally friendly nature warrants further study. As surfactants act on the lipid envelope, viral proteins, and nucleocapsid proteins, LPB could be potentially used as an adjuvant with other antiviral agents to control the prevalence of viral diseases and improve therapeutic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.