ArticleNanoscale horizons2026
Integrating molecular dynamics simulations to enable rational assembly of immune signals for immunotherapy.
Article in Nanoscale horizons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the importance of biophysical cues in tuning the immune response, the connections between these cues and immunological outcomes are poorly understood in the context of immunotherapies. To study these connections, our lab designed therapeutic complexes that are self-assembled from peptide antigens modified with cationic amino acid residues and anionic, nucleic acid-based modulatory cues. We utilized the self-assembly platform as a tool to understand how tuning the biophysical properties of immune signals impacts molecular interactions during self-assembly. Here, we implemented molecular dynamics simulations as a tool to study how molecular interactions between cationic peptides and anionic modulatory cues change as a function of peptide design. Using temperature replica exchange molecular dynamics, we compare molecular contacts - including hydrogen bonding and salt bridges - across a library of peptide sequences that are mistakenly attacked during autoimmune disease. We show that peptides with higher cationic charge and peptides anchored with arginine residues form more electrostatic interactions during self-assembly than peptides with lower cationic charge and peptides anchored with lysine residues, respectively. Surface plasmon resonance studies revealed that in addition to the type of anchored amino acid residue, the distribution of charge across the peptide also impacts the binding affinity of self-assembled immune cues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.