Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42300925›Full record

Observational studyPaediatric anaesthesia2026

Impact of Difficult Laryngoscopy on First-Pass Success and Adverse Events in Pediatric Emergency Department Intubations.

Tom Solan, Stefan Sabato, Hatem Alkhouri, Michael Dinh, Katie Reeves, Andrew Tagg, Nathan Forsyth, Bernard McCarthy, Eleanor Loughhead, Ben Lawton and 11 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Paediatric anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Tom SolanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7827-0324
Stefan SabatoDepartment of Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Hatem AlkhouriIntelligence and Support for Innovation, Transformation and Evaluation, Agency for Clinical Innovation, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5569-704X
Michael DinhDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Katie ReevesDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queensland Children's Hospital, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5268-6153
Andrew TaggDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nathan ForsythDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
Bernard McCarthyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Perth Children's Hospital, Western Australia, Australia.
Eleanor LoughheadDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Ben LawtonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Logan Hospital, Queensland, Australia.
Matthew GormanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Redcliffe Hospital, Queensland, Australia.
Jeremy FurykDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Frances KinnearWider Bay Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Australia.
Andrew BrainardDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kidz First Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Meredith L BorlandDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Perth Children's Hospital, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5326-5008
Shane GeorgeDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Children's Critical Care, Gold Coast University Hospital, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8880-1245
Amit KocharDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Women and Children's Hospital, South Australia, Australia.
Simon CraigPaediatric Emergency Department, Monash Medical Centre, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Franz E BablDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1107-2187
Elliot LongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
A collaboration between the Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) network and the Australian and New Zealand Emergency Department Airway Registry (ANZEDAR)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAirway management in the Emergency Department (ED) can be challenging, particularly in children. Difficult laryngoscopy reduces first-pass success and increases complications, but pediatric ED data remain limited.

methodsWe conducted a prospective, observational study of pediatric intubations recorded in the Australian and New Zealand Emergency Department Airway Registry (ANZEDAR) between 2012 and 2025, including 25 Pediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) sites. The primary outcome was the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy. Secondary outcomes were the impact of difficult laryngoscopy on First-Pass Success (FPS) and adverse events. The main exposure variable was laryngoscopic grade, defined as difficult when a Cormack-Lehane Grade 3 or 4 view was encountered on the first attempt. Patient, procedural, and operator characteristics were assessed as potential confounders.

resultsOf 946 pediatric ED intubations recorded across 55 sites (including 25 PREDICT pediatric sites) between 2012 and 2025, 865 were included in the analysis after exclusion of cases with missing laryngoscopic grade. The median age was 3.5 years. Difficult laryngoscopy (Cormack-Lehane grade 3-4) was observed in 65 cases (7.5%). FPS was significantly lower in patients with a difficult view compared with those with a non-difficult view (41.5% vs. 87.9%; OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.06-0.17). Adverse events were more frequent in the difficult-view group, including hypoxaemia (38.5% vs. 11.5%; OR 4.81, 95% CI 2.79-8.29) and esophageal intubation (15.4% vs. 1.3%; OR 14.36, 95% CI 5.73-35.98).

conclusionDifficult laryngoscopy in pediatric ED intubations is relatively infrequent but associated with reduced FPS and increased complications. These findings emphasize the importance of ongoing quality improvement and may help inform training and escalation strategies. Continued registry participation is valuable to capture these low-frequency events and better understand their consequences.

Indexed as

Airway ManagementEmergency Service, HospitalIntubation, IntratrachealLaryngoscopyAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleNew ZealandPediatric AnesthesiaProspective StudiesRegistriesairway managementairway registrydifficult laryngoscopyintratrachealintubationpediatrics

Identifiers

PMID42300925
PMCPMC13460538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.