Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42300760›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026

From vision to action: a theory of change for introductory biology education reform.

Kristin M Lewis, Michelle A Whaley, Kathleen Quardokus Fisher, Dominic T Chaloner, Stuart E Jones, Matthew J Kloser, Elizabeth A Archie, Patricia A Champion, Shaun W Lee, Jeffrey S Schorey and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kristin M LewisDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-3160-0623
Michelle A WhaleyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-1328-0898
Kathleen Quardokus FisherKaneb Center for Teaching Excellence, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3319-9146
Dominic T ChalonerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8861-3255
Stuart E JonesDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4740-6721
Matthew J KloserInstitute for Educational Initiatives, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4902-9854
Elizabeth A ArchieDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1187-0998
Patricia A ChampionDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6733-596X
Shaun W LeeDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9305-2050
Jeffrey S SchoreyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1305-0651
Crislyn D'Souza-SchoreyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8389-055X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calls for reform in undergraduate biology education, such as Vision and Change, advocate for student-centered learning that emphasizes core concepts and scientific practices. Yet, translating these calls into lasting curricular transformation remains a complex, context-dependent challenge. In this paper, we describe how our department developed and implemented a new introductory biology course sequence using a theory of change (ToC) to guide a second-order, department-wide reform effort. Our ToC was grounded in organizational and educational change theories and emphasized three core arguments: (i) starting from scratch to disrupt previous frameworks, (ii) employing a design thinking process to foster innovation and consensus, and (iii) engaging in intentional knowledge sharing to elicit faculty contributions and a shared vision. The ToC guided a vision phase in which we engaged stakeholders and developed a new conceptual framework that set broad goals for an ideal course sequence; a development phase, where we creatively brainstormed proposals without constraints until a consensus emerged; and an implementation phase, which resulted in a course sequence consisting of two unique lecture-based courses and two research-focused laboratory courses. The new structure emphasized research engagement, active learning, and integration across biological scales, aligning with both departmental values and Vision and Change principles. Ongoing communication ensured strong faculty investment and sustained implementation. Seven years after adoption, the sequence continues to receive broad support and has led to improved student satisfaction and retention. By sharing our ToC-driven approach, we offer a practical, adaptable model for departments seeking to enact meaningful, long-term change in undergraduate biology education.

Indexed as

curricular changedesign thinkingintroductory biologytheory of changeVision and Change

Identifiers

PMID42300760
PMCPMC13520650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.