ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Microsaccade Dynamics During Visual Fixation as Markers for Parkinson's Disease: A Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Microsaccades have long been of interest in vision and oculomotor research, but their potential as biomarkers in movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD) remains underexplored. This study investigates the extent to which microsaccades carry information that can differentiate individuals with PD from a healthy population. Methods: We analyzed eye movements from 50 individuals with early-to-moderate stage PD and 43 healthy controls (HCs) recorded during a visual fixation task, without physically restricting head movements or interfering with the participants' natural behavior. To assess the predictive value of microsaccades for distinguishing PD from HCs, we train and evaluate a diverse set of machine learning classifiers on microsaccade features. Results: Microsaccades identified under these recording conditions show characteristics consistent with those reported in more controlled experimental settings. Microsaccades in the PD group occur more frequently, have larger amplitudes, and exhibit stronger horizontal bias than those in the HC group. Most classification models perform significantly better than chance. A polynomial support vector machine (SVM) achieves a classification accuracy of 77.4% on held-out test subjects, with balanced sensitivity (76.1%) and specificity (78.9%). Moreover, by discarding predictions with low confidence at the microsaccade level, performance can be further improved at the subject level. Conclusions: Microsaccades carry discriminative information capable of distinguishing individuals with PD from HCs, underscoring their potential value as early markers of motor dysfunction in PD. Translational Relevance: This study establishes a promising baseline against which future learning algorithms can be evaluated, with the long-term goal of developing clinically useful prediction models based on oculomotor behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.