ReviewPhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP2026
Tuning the metal-support interactions in transition metal-anchored heteroatom-doped graphene single-atom catalysts.
Review in Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tuning the metal-support interactions in transition metal-anchored heteroatom-doped graphene single-atom catalysts.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transition metal-anchored, heteroatom-doped graphene single-atom catalysts have emerged as a promising class of catalysts that combine the strengths of traditional homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis. Strong metal-support interactions are critical for ensuring long-term catalyst stability and durability. This review assesses strategies for tuning the metal-support interactions in graphene-based single-atom catalysts, with the focus on insights from quantum chemical calculations. By systematically comparing computational studies, we address how variations in key structural and electronic features influence the metal-support bond strength. We evaluate the influence of graphene defect topology by comparing single and double vacancy sites, examine the role of heteroatom dopants (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.