ArticleEcology2026
Linking genome size variation to phenotypic selection on target traits.
Article in Ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome size (GS) is known to be highly variable among angiosperm species. However, this variation can also occur within species. Both interspecific and intraspecific variations in GS have been often found to be linked to phenotypic traits. Therefore, selective pressures acting on these target traits may indirectly shape GS evolution within and among species. However, the processes linking selective pressures to GS evolution are typically studied at broad phylogenetic scales, often overlooking how these processes operate at the microevolutionary level, where selection acts on standing variation within species. Recently diverging species or independently evolving lineages offer ideal settings to test whether selection shaping GS variation within lineages is reflected in patterns of GS variation among them, thereby linking microevolutionary and macroevolutionary processes. Here, we combined flow cytometric estimates of GS with measurements of leaf and floral traits, known to be targets of selective pressures, in both common garden and wild populations of two recently diverged Dianthus rupicola lineages. Then, we tested for an allometric relationship between GS and such phenotypic traits. Finally, we characterized the biotic and abiotic environment of wild populations and quantified plant reproductive success to identify selective pressures acting on traits showing an allometric relationship with GS. We found substantial GS variation, primarily driven by differences between the two lineages, but also occurring within lineages. GS showed a strong allometric relationship with two leaf traits, that is, stomata area and epidermal cell dimension, and one floral trait, that is, style length, in both lineages. Leaf traits reflected similar patterns of local adaptation to the edaphic environment in the two lineages, whereas divergent biotic pressures between lineages were associated with variation in style length. Our selection analysis revealed that style length was negatively associated with plant reproductive success in the lineage interacting with the pre-dispersal seed predator Hadena, while the opposite trend was observed in the lineage where this interaction is absent. By demonstrating how ecological factors shape traits covarying with GS both within and between lineages, this study provides a valuable framework to bridge micro- and macroevolutionary processes in GS evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.