Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42300309›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical imaging2026

An Efficient and Cohesive System for Enhanced Accuracy in Malignant Brain Tumor Diagnosis.

Laouni Djafri, Yacine Gafour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laouni DjafriDepartment of Mathematics, Ibn Khaldoun University of Tiaret, Tiaret, Algeria.
Yacine GafourDepartment of Mathematics, Ibn Khaldoun University of Tiaret, Tiaret, Algeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/

objectiveBrain tumors present a significant health challenge, making an accurate diagnosis crucial for effective treatment and improved patient outcomes. This study aims to develop SCSFE-DiagBT, an advanced deep learning framework that integrates classification and segmentation. It is designed for enhanced brain tumor diagnosis using MRI scans.

methodsWe propose a Stacked Classification and Segmentation Model with Feature Extraction (SCSFE-DiagBT). This model unifies the processes of classification and segmentation into a single diagnostic pipeline. It leverages the complementarity of both tasks by employing a deep learning approach to efficiently analyze MRI scans.

resultsExperimental results indicate substantial improvements in performance metrics. In classification, metrics such as accuracy, precision, and recall improved by up to 31% compared to baseline models, with high accuracy. For segmentation, the model achieved a 12% improvement in the Dice coefficient, reaching an accuracy of 99.58% and a Dice score of 86.30%. This demonstrates robust generalization and minimal overfitting. DISCUSSION: The findings underscore the effectiveness of integrating classification and segmentation in the diagnosis of brain tumors. The enhanced interpretability through feature extraction further supports the model's utility in clinical settings, potentially reducing diagnostic variability associated with manual interpretations.

conclusionSCSFE-DiagBT emerges as a highly accurate and viable tool for brain tumor diagnosis. It offers significant advancements over traditional methods and promising implications for improving patient care and outcomes in neuro-oncology.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansBrain tumorDeep learningEnsemble learningFeatures extractionSegmentationTumor diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID42300309
PMCPMC13613305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.