ArticleGenetics2026
Mount Fuji's stubby peak: the genotypic density of additive landscapes near maximal fitness.
Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Additive fitness landscapes-also called Mount Fuji landscapes-are the simplest and most widely used models of sequence-function relationships. As such, they play essential roles across multiple areas of biology, including evolutionary theory, quantitative genetics, gene regulation, and protein science. One of the most basic properties of any fitness landscape is its genotypic density-the number of sequences near a given fitness value. Understanding this density is especially important near fitness peaks, as it quantifies the supply of high-fitness genotypes. Here I study the genotypic density of additive landscapes near fitness peaks. Although this density is well known to be approximately Gaussian near the middle of the fitness range, its behavior near maximal fitness has not been reported. I begin by deriving a saddle-point approximation that accurately describes the genotypic density of additive landscapes over virtually the entire fitness range. I then show that the log of this density follows a power law near maximal fitness, with the exponent determined by how much the best allele at each position outperforms its nearest competitor. This power-law behavior holds over a substantial fraction of fitness values, besting the Gaussian approximation on both simulated and empirical landscapes across roughly a quarter to a third of the fitness range. Under certain conditions this behavior also extends to globally epistatic landscapes (defined as nonlinear functions of one or more additive traits), though with a reduced range of validity. These findings advance our understanding of one of the most fundamental models of sequence-function relationships. In particular, they reveal that the uppermost reaches of Mount Fuji landscapes, rather than being sharply peaked, are actually quite stubby.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42299915What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.