Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42299910›Full record

ArticleTranscultural psychiatry2026

Respecting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Pluralism and Human Rights in Civil Society.

Laurence J Kirmayer, Dörte Bemme, G Eric Jarvis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transcultural psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laurence J KirmayerDivision of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6228-1739
Dörte BemmeDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
G Eric JarvisDivision of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0508-6689

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are foundational values for cultural psychiatry. The current assault on DEI in the United States and other countries represents a direct challenge to the scientific, ethical, and clinical commitments that have guided progress in mental health over recent decades. This paper examines the history, rationale, and successes of DEI frameworks in health care and psychiatry, discusses legitimate critiques, documents the scope and consequences of the current anti-DEI movement in the United States and other jurisdictions, and draws comparisons with Canadian and United Kingdom contexts. We revisit each component of DEI-diversity, equity, and inclusion-to clarify its scientific grounding and moral significance for mental health. We argue that, rather than dismantling DEI, cultural psychiatry and allied disciplines must respond with renewed commitment to the values of DEI as well as those of dignity, empathy, and integrity, as ways to advance social justice and pluralistic civil society.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityEthnopsychologyHealth EquityHuman RightsSocial InclusionSocial JusticeCanadaDiversity, Equity, InclusionHumansUnited KingdomUnited Statescultural psychiatrydiversityequityhealth equityinclusionmental health policysocial justicestructural racism

Identifiers

PMID42299910
PMCPMC13309619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.