SynthesisOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2026
Impact of Life-Context Factors on Chronic Rhinosinusitis 22-Item Sinonasal Outcomes Test: Systematic Review + Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveChronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) affects all sociodemographic groups. While studies have explored social determinants of health (SDOH), sociodemographics, and health behaviors, their specific effects on CRS outcomes are unclear, making tailored care difficult. This review examines how these "Life-Context" factors influence 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores before and after treatment. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines, searching Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science through 12/2024. REVIEW
methodsEligible CRS studies with comparison groups reporting SNOT-22 outcomes were reviewed. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool assessed bias. Random-effects meta-analysis estimated the pooled effect on SNOT-22 when two studies reported comparable cohorts.
resultsOf 3180 records identified, 61 studies met inclusion criteria. Females had worse baseline SNOT-22 scores, but similar improvements postsurgery as males (baseline SMD = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.24-0.36; 2-years postsurgery: SMD = 0.04, 95% CI: -0.33-0.41). Younger patients often had higher baseline SNOT-22. Race and ethnicity data were limited and variable; no significant differences were found. Education and income showed inconsistent links to SNOT-22 scores. Medicaid and private insurance patients had worse baseline scores than Medicare (SMD = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.48-1.15 and 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10-0.49, respectively). Smokers had worse SNOT-22 (SMD = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.22-0.53). Environmental factors showed weak, inconsistent effects. There is limited data on food security, social support, and care access.
conclusionVarious Life-Context factors influence CRS and affect SNOT-22 outcomes. Specifically, factors like sex, ethnicity, insurance status, and smoking impact these outcomes. Variability in studies and reporting methods hinder clear conclusions. Standardized data collection on these factors is vital for improving understanding and ensuring equitable care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.