Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42299801›Full record

Observational studyNeurourology and urodynamics2026

A Novel Template for Intravesical Botulinum Toxin Injection in Patients With Idiopathic Overactive Bladder: A Cohort Study.

Gildardo Guilombo Salcedo, Jhonatan Sair Santafé Galvis, Sofia Elizabeth Muñoz Medina, Álvaro Gutiérrez Martínez

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gildardo Guilombo SalcedoSanitas University Fundation, Urobosque Urological Center, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6942-4069
Jhonatan Sair Santafé GalvisSanitas University Fundation, Urobosque Urological Center, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1499-2560
Sofia Elizabeth Muñoz MedinaSanitas University Fundation, Urobosque Urological Center, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8038-298X
Álvaro Gutiérrez MartínezSanitas University Fundation, Urobosque Urological Center, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5262-2183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe intravesical injection of onoabotulinum toxin A is a cornerstone in the management of overactive bladder. Traditionally, treatment involves 20 injection sites, avoiding the bladder trigone. Recent studies have shown that trigonal injections do not induce or increase vesicoureteral reflux. A novel injection template has recently been proposed, consisting of 10 injection sites: 2 in the trigone, 4 in the retrigonal area, and 4 in the bladder fundus. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of the traditional and the novel injection templates in patients with OAB symptoms.

methodsAn observational, analytical, and retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients aged 18 years or older with idiopathic overactive bladder refractory to oral pharmacological treatment were included. All participants underwent intravesical injection of botulinum toxin at a urology center in Bogotá between January 2023 and December 2024. Patients without follow-up data were excluded. Two groups were compared: those treated with the traditional injection template and those treated with the novel template. The sample size was calculated as 70 patients per group. The primary outcome was efficacy, defined as improvement in urinary frequency, urgency, and incontinence symptoms 6 months after treatment. The secondary outcome was safety, defined as the occurrence of adverse events within 6 months of the injection. A descriptive analysis was performed using measures of central tendency and dispersion. Bivariate analysis was carried out using the Mann-Whitney and Chi-square tests.

resultsA total of 133 patients were included: 67 in Group 1 (novel template) and 66 in Group 2 (traditional template). The median age was 64 years, and 80.45% were women. No significant differences were found in sociodemographic variables or baseline symptoms between the two groups. The primary outcome showed a significant difference favoring Group 1, with overall symptom improvement (total + partial response) of 90.91% versus 75.76% for urinary urgency, 85.18% versus 68.51% for urinary frequency, and 94.6% versus 61.91% for urinary incontinence, respectively, for Groups 1 and 2. The overall incidence of adverse events was 11.28% (95% CI: 6.45-17.92), with no statistically significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). The most frequent events were urinary tract infection, pain, hematuria, and the need for clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). All events were mild and did not require hospitalization. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsThe 10-point injection template for botulinum toxin administration, which includes two trigonal sites, demonstrated greater effectiveness than the traditional template in improving symptoms of urgency, frequency, and incontinence. Although mild adverse events were observed, there were no significant differences between the two groups, and the overall incidence was lower than that reported in the literature. The new 10-point template represents an innovative, effective, safe, and practical alternative for intravesical botulinum toxin administration in patients with overactive bladder refractory to oral therapy.

Indexed as

Acetylcholine Release InhibitorsBotulinum Toxins, Type AUrinary Bladder, OveractiveAdministration, IntravesicalAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAcetylcholine Release InhibitorsBotulinum Toxins, Type Abotulinum toxin type Aoverative bladderurge urinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID42299801
PMCPMC13481892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.