ArticleJournal of the science of food and agriculture2026
Total monomeric anthocyanin concentration estimation of red wines based on color data using multivariate statistical analysis and machine learning.
Article in Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRed wine is a high-value grape derivative containing complex chemical compounds that dictate its quality. Qualitative and quantitative determination of these compounds is essential for standardizing and classifying the product. This proof-of-concept study integrates chemometric methods and machine learning algorithms to establish predictive models for estimating total monomeric anthocyanin (TMA) concentration in red wines using non-destructive colorimetric data.
resultsImages were generated and analyzed using wine samples at three liquid depths (2, 3 and 4 mm) across three color spaces (RGB, HSV and Lab). To predict TMA content from extracted digital image features, partial least squares regression (PLSR), random forest (RF) and artificial neural network (ANN) models were evaluated using external validation and stratified five-fold cross-validation. Optimal imaging configurations were identified as 2 mm + HSV for PLSR and 2 mm + Lab for both RF and ANN. Cross-validated performance metrics yielded mean test R
conclusionUnder these controlled experimental conditions, non-linear methods (RF and ANN) demonstrated significantly stronger predictive performance than the linear PLSR model (P < 0.05). This methodology offers a rapid, non-destructive and highly promising approach for the accurate determination of TMA. © 2026 The Author(s). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.