ArticleMedicine2026
The correlation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging findings with clinical diagnoses and its acute impact on management changes in a regional Australian hospital.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a noninvasive, detailed imaging modality regarded as the gold standard for assessing cardiac structure, function, and tissue characteristics. Data on its impact in acute settings, particularly in regional centers, remain limited. We evaluated the clinical impact of CMR on diagnostic accuracy and management decisions in acute cardiovascular presentations at a single regional Australian hospital. This retrospective, single-center study included 111 adult acute patients who underwent CMR in 2024. Pre- and post-CMR diagnoses and management plans were compared using Cohen kappa to assess agreement and quantify overall impact. CMR led to significant diagnostic reclassification, as supported by fair agreement between pre- and post-CMR diagnoses (κ = 0.305, P < .001). Management plans changed in 66.6% of cases, with fewer unnecessary treatments and altered procedural decisions; agreement was slight (κ = 0.079, P = .046). CMR significantly improved diagnostic precision and influenced downstream clinical management in acute cardiac settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.