ReviewArchives of academic emergency medicine2026
Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography for Identification of Skull Fracture in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Review in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: There is no consensus on the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography for identifying skull fractures in children, and the accuracy of this imaging modality in this age group has been questioned. This study performed a pooled analysis to explore the diagnostic performance characteristics of ultrasonography in this regard. Methods: Three databases, Web of Science, Medline, and Scopus, were systematically searched from their inception through August 2025. Data extraction of diagnostic parameters was performed by two independent authors. Pooled estimates of the diagnostic parameters were calculated using Meta-Disc software and the MIDAS package of Stata. Results: The estimated sensitivity of ultrasonography for detecting skull fracture in children was 0.89 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-0.92), and the specificity was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98). The estimated positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 23.21 (95% CI: 14.84-36.32), while the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.13 (95% CI: 0.09-0.20). The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 208.89 (95% CI: 112.68-387.27), and the estimated overall diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography was 0.96. Conclusion: Ultrasonography demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for identifying skull fractures in children, with evidence indicating stronger performance for confirmation than for exclusion. However, the high risk of bias in patient selection across the studies limits the generalizability of the evidence, and the results should therefore be interpreted with appropriate caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.