ArticleArchives of academic emergency medicine2026
Comparing RAMA-LVO with other Prehospital Large-Vessel Occlusion Prediction Scales in Suspected Acute Stroke; A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study.
Article in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Stroke is a leading global cause of disability, with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) representing a significant proportion of ischemic strokes and requiring timely endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for optimal outcomes. This study aimed to validate and compare RAMA-LVO with other prehospital LVO prediction scales. Methods: This retrospective, single-center diagnostic accuracy study included adult patients who were triaged as suspected acute stroke in the emergency department (ED) of a university hospital. Four prehospital LVO prediction scales including RAMA-LVO, Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation (RACE), Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination (FAST-ED), and Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS) were calculated from documented neurological assessments and compared against confirmed vascular imaging findings. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), with comparative analysis by DeLong's test and calibration plots to assess model fit. Results: Of the 1,463 patients with suspected acute stroke, 853 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 124 (14.54%) confirmed to have large-vessel occlusion (LVO), most commonly involving the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery. Patients with LVO were older (p < 0.001), had higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (p < 0.001), and were more likely to receive intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy (p < 0.001) compared with non-LVO patients. Among the four prehospital LVO scales, FAST-ED showed the highest discriminative performance (AUROC = 0.873), closely followed by RAMA-LVO (AUROC = 0.858), while RAMA-LVO demonstrated the highest sensitivity but slightly lower specificity relative to other scales. Conclusion: The RAMA-LVO score demonstrated strong accuracy for identifying acute LVO stroke, comparable to FAST-ED, and may serve as a practical prehospital triage tool for directing patients to thrombectomy-capable centers, especially in regions with transfer delays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.