ReviewJB & JS open access
Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Comparative Review of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes.
Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
» Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has evolved from an implant-limited procedure to a technique-sensitive operation, with surgical approach selection emerging as a key determinant of soft-tissue complications, deformity correction, and alignment accuracy. » Anterior and lateral transfibular approaches offer distinct advantages and tradeoffs in visualization, angiosome preservation, deformity correction, and technical complexity, and should not be viewed as interchangeable corridors. » Anterior approaches remain the most widely used and compatible with most implant systems but carry the highest risk of wound complications, particularly in patients with compromised anterior soft tissues or vascular disease. » The lateral transfibular approach provides extensile exposure and facilitates coronal-plane deformity correction while preserving anterior skin perfusion, at the cost of added bony morbidity, increased technical demands related to fibular osteotomy and fixation, and constrained revision options because failed lateral systems often require revision through an anterior approach using alternative implants. » Optimal outcomes in TAA depend less on the chosen approach itself than on appropriate patient selection, meticulous soft-tissue management, implant-approach compatibility, and surgeon experience, emphasizing the need for individualized, strategy-driven approach selection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.