Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42299326›Full record

ReviewBMJ oncology2026

Unveiling the variations in penile cancer care: identifying knowledge gaps and research priorities.

Gagan Prakash, Amandeep Arora, Giuseppe Basile, Samarpita Mohanty, Amit Joshi, Santosh Menon, Hetakshi Shah, Marco Bandini, Vedang Murthy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gagan PrakashDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Amandeep AroraDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Giuseppe BasileUrological Research Institute, San Raffaele Hospital Urology Unit, Milan, Lombardy, Italy.
Samarpita MohantyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Navi Mumbai, India.
Amit JoshiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Navi Mumbai, India.
Santosh MenonDepartment of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Hetakshi ShahTata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Marco BandiniUrological Research Institute, San Raffaele Hospital Urology Unit, Milan, Lombardy, Italy.
Vedang MurthyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Navi Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6011-9319

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile cancer (PeCa) is a rare malignancy with substantial global variation in clinical presentation, staging practices and treatment approaches. This scoping review synthesises current evidence across key domains of PeCa management, including tumour classification, human papillomavirus (HPV) integration, organ preservation, nodal staging, systemic therapy and survivorship care. Despite recent updates in the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, limitations persist, particularly the absence of biologically relevant factors such as HPV status. While HPV-associated tumours may exhibit different responses to radiotherapy and systemic treatments, routine HPV testing and serotyping are not yet standardised in clinical practice. Early-stage PeCa remains amenable to organ-sparing approaches-including brachytherapy and reconstructive surgery-yet access to these modalities varies widely. Nodal management remains an area of controversy, with global inconsistencies in surgical templates and staging algorithms. Dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy is emerging as a minimally invasive alternative but remains underused outside of high-volume centres. For node-positive disease, there is growing support for treatment intensification with chemotherapy and radiotherapy; however, prospective evidence is limited. Survivorship issues, particularly regarding psychosocial support and functional outcomes, remain poorly addressed in both research and routine care. This review identifies persistent gaps in the literature and highlights the need for international consensus-building, longitudinal data collection and equitable access to multidisciplinary care through collaborative efforts.

Indexed as

Medical oncologyPenile cancerRadiation oncologySurgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID42299326
PMCPMC13264896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.