ReviewBMJ oncology2026
Unveiling the variations in penile cancer care: identifying knowledge gaps and research priorities.
Review in BMJ oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Penile cancer (PeCa) is a rare malignancy with substantial global variation in clinical presentation, staging practices and treatment approaches. This scoping review synthesises current evidence across key domains of PeCa management, including tumour classification, human papillomavirus (HPV) integration, organ preservation, nodal staging, systemic therapy and survivorship care. Despite recent updates in the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, limitations persist, particularly the absence of biologically relevant factors such as HPV status. While HPV-associated tumours may exhibit different responses to radiotherapy and systemic treatments, routine HPV testing and serotyping are not yet standardised in clinical practice. Early-stage PeCa remains amenable to organ-sparing approaches-including brachytherapy and reconstructive surgery-yet access to these modalities varies widely. Nodal management remains an area of controversy, with global inconsistencies in surgical templates and staging algorithms. Dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy is emerging as a minimally invasive alternative but remains underused outside of high-volume centres. For node-positive disease, there is growing support for treatment intensification with chemotherapy and radiotherapy; however, prospective evidence is limited. Survivorship issues, particularly regarding psychosocial support and functional outcomes, remain poorly addressed in both research and routine care. This review identifies persistent gaps in the literature and highlights the need for international consensus-building, longitudinal data collection and equitable access to multidisciplinary care through collaborative efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.