Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42299315›Full record

ArticleAnnals of neurosciences2026

Pornography Use, Motivational Patterns and Suicidal Ideation Among Young Adults: A Cross-sectional Behavioural Analysis.

Chandreyee Roy, Ahmed Sameer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chandreyee RoyDepartment of Humanities & Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6414-034X
Ahmed SameerDepartment of Humanities & Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6066-726X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pornography engagement is frequently examined through exposure-based frameworks that assume higher levels of consumption are associated with adverse psychological outcomes. Emerging evidence suggests that such engagement reflects underlying reward-processing and affect-regulation mechanisms. However, prior findings regarding its association with suicidal ideation remain inconsistent. Purpose: The present study aimed to examine the association between pornography exposure, consumption motives, depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation among young adults. Methods: A cross-sectional sample of 541 university students completed measures of pornography exposure intensity, pornography consumption motives, depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation. Bayesian regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between pornography use, motives, depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation. Results: Depressive symptoms emerged as the most robust predictor of suicidal ideation across all models. Pornography exposure intensity demonstrated a small negative association with suicidal ideation ( Conclusion: The findings suggest that pornography use is not uniformly associated with suicidal ideation. Instead, associations vary depending on various psychological factors and motives for use. As the study is cross-sectional, the findings should be interpreted as associational rather than causal. These results highlight the importance of considering emotional regulation and individual vulnerability when examining the mental health implications of pornography use.

Indexed as

Bayesian regressiondepressionPornography usesuicidal ideationyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID42299315
PMCPMC13264530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.