ArticleGland surgery2026
Robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy in children: a retrospective institutional study.
Article in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy is an established procedure in adults, offering a scar-free-in-the-neck result. Application of this technique in the pediatric population, where thyroid disease can be more aggressive and cosmetic outcomes carry lifelong developmental and psychosocial significance, remains limited and underreported. This study reports the feasibility, safety, and perioperative outcomes of robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy in a pediatric cohort. Methods: Single-institution retrospective cohort study of all pediatric patients (age ≤18 years) who underwent robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy at our institution between January 2012 and December 2022. Descriptive statistics were used; no formal comparative analysis was performed owing to the absence of a contemporaneous control group. Results: Fifteen patients were included (mean age 14.3±2.5 years; 13 adolescents, 2 children ≤12 years; 80% female). Indications: indeterminate cytology (Bethesda III/IV, n=6, 40%), biopsy-confirmed papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC, n=7, 46.7%), and benign goiter (n=2, 13.3%). Eight patients (53.3%) underwent lobectomy; seven (46.7%) total thyroidectomy; central neck dissection (CND) in five (33.3%). Mean operative time was 210±45 minutes (range, 140-300 minutes), decreasing to 180±30 minutes in the last five cases-substantially longer than published open pediatric benchmarks (65-134 minutes). No conversion to open surgery occurred. All 15 patients underwent routine postoperative flexible nasolaryngoscopy (FNL); no vocal cord motion impairment was identified. Two patients (13.3%) experienced transient hypocalcaemia; one (6.7%) an axillary seroma; both resolved without sequelae. R0 resection was achieved in all malignant cases. No PTC recurrences were observed at median 2.8-year follow-up (range, 0.5-5.0 years). No validated QoL or cosmetic assessment was performed in this pediatric cohort. Conclusions: In this small single-institution series, robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy was technically feasible and safe in carefully selected pediatric patients, with low morbidity and short hospital stays. These findings are hypothesis-generating only and do not establish superiority over conventional open thyroidectomy. The substantially longer operative time and absence of validated patient-reported outcome data are key limitations. Prospective multi-centre studies with validated QoL instruments and a contemporaneous control group are urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.