Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42299283›Full record

ReviewGland surgery2026

Complications associated with acellular dermal matrix use in implant-based breast reconstruction.

Isabelle T Smith, Ayana K Cole-Price, Neil Tanna, Mark L Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isabelle T SmithDivision of Plastic Surgery, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Ayana K Cole-PriceSection of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Neil TannaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Mark L SmithDivision of Plastic Surgery, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1907-0812

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has become an established adjunct in implant-based breast reconstruction, improving implant coverage, pocket control, and soft-tissue support and hastening the adoption of prepectoral techniques. Notwithstanding its more than two decades of use in breast reconstruction, breast reconstruction remains an off-label indication for ADM use in the US. Human, porcine, and bovine sources have all been used to provide ADMs. They undergo distinct processing and sterilization methods that may affect matrix architecture, host integration, and clinical performance. Following implantation, ADM serves as a biologic scaffold for cellular infiltration and neovascularization. However, its use remains associated with important complications, including seroma, infection, red breast syndrome (RBS), mastectomy skin flap necrosis (MSFN), implant exposure, and reconstructive failure. Reported outcomes vary widely across the literature, likely due to differences in reconstructive technique, mastectomy flap perfusion, ADM characteristics, perioperative management, and patient risk factors. Elevated body mass index (BMI), smoking, diabetes, prior radiation, larger ADM burden, and compromised skin flap vascularity consistently emerge as contributors to adverse outcomes. From a clinical standpoint, successful ADM use depends on judicious application, meticulous technique, and early recognition of evolving complications. Despite its off-label status, ADM use in breast reconstruction remains widespread and an important tool for plastic surgeons.

Indexed as

Acellular dermal matrix (ADM)breast reconstructioncomplicationsmastectomy

Identifiers

PMID42299283
PMCPMC13264775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.