ArticleBMJ public health2026
Determinants of WHO's Problem Management Plus (PM+) uptake within health and integration sectors in Switzerland: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The prevalence of common mental disorders in resettled refugee populations is nearly three times higher than in the general population. The WHO recommends Methods: We conducted in-depth key informant interviews in the German-speaking and French-speaking parts of Switzerland (September 2023 and January 2025). Design and analysis of interviews was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Themes were added both inductively and deductively and categorised into challenges and opportunities for widespread PM+ service delivery. Results: We interviewed 30 stakeholders: 12 policymakers, 5 government leaders, 5 specialists and implementers and 8 non-specialist peer-providers. Whilst stakeholders were enthusiastic about the value of PM+, several limitations to its routine delivery were noted. These related to limited quality standards and control for non-specialist delivered interventions that prevented formal categorisation within the health system. Endorsement by professional associations including best-practice standards was thought to facilitate such formalised recognition. Prioritising mental health indicators within Cantonal integration programmes was perceived to facilitate funding via the national integration agenda. All stakeholders pointed towards blended co-financing pathways to ensure the longer-term sustainability of PM+ in Switzerland. Conclusions: The routine delivery of PM+ within health and integration systems presented substantial challenges and opportunities. Longer-term sustainability of PM+ may be feasible with blended financing, tailored Cantonal health and integration agendas, and established quality control standards for PM+ delivery that include formal recognition of non-specialists within the mental health system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.