Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42299250›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Opioid-related emergency department visits in Saudi Arabia: an interrupted time series analysis of visit patterns pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19.

Raseel Alroba, Almaha Alfakhri, Maha Aldoughaim, Khalid Aldamiri, Nawaf Alrogi, Khaled Alboug, Ali Gado, Turki Althunian, Ohoud Almadani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Raseel AlrobaSaudi Food and Drug Authority, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4759-856X
Almaha AlfakhriSaudi Food and Drug Authority, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.
Maha AldoughaimKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid AldamiriMinistry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9852-1776
Nawaf AlrogiForensic Medicine Services Center, Saudi Arabia Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0111-1767
Khaled AlbougForensic Toxicology Services Department, Saudi Arabia Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0807-3841
Ali GadoForensic Toxicology Services Department, Saudi Arabia Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9150-0267
Turki AlthunianSaudi Food and Drug Authority, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.
Ohoud AlmadaniSaudi Food and Drug Authority, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6246-0841

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The impact of emergency department (ED) visits related to opioid and psychotropic substances has become increasingly critical in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study evaluates whether the COVID-19 lockdown was temporally associated with an increasing trend of opioid- and psychotropic-related ED visits in Saudi Arabia. Methods: An interrupted time series analysis was conducted using data on ED visits from a centralised Saudi electronic health records database (1 February 2018-30 April 2022). Additionally, laboratory tests related to substance abuse/misuse were obtained from a centralised Saudi toxicology database (1 January 2019-31 May 2021). Adults (≥18 years) with ED visits related to opioid use disorders (OUDs) or psychotropic misuse were included. The immediate (pulse) and prolonged (slope) effects temporally associated with the March 2020 COVID-19 lockdown on substance abuse-related ED visits were evaluated using autoregressive integrated moving average models. Results: 3730 ED visits and 390 toxicology tests related to OUDs and 517 ED visits and 3513 toxicology tests related to psychotropic misuse were identified. The lockdown was temporarily associated with an immediate increase in OUD-related ED visits (pulse: 14.75 visits, 95% CI 9.65 to 19.86), followed by a monthly decrease (slope: -0.06 visits, 95% CI -0.08 to -0.03). It was also temporally associated with an immediate decrease in psychotropic-related ED tests (pulse: -185.7, 95% CI -309.50 to -61.99). Conclusions: The COVID-19 lockdown was temporally associated with changes in both OUD-related ED visits and psychotropic ED tests. These findings underscore the need for policies to mitigate substance use risks during such interventions and to improve data quality for future research.

Indexed as

COVID-19Drug MonitoringPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID42299250
PMCPMC13264884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.