Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42299220›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Functional and Cosmetic Outcomes of Pterional Craniotomy and Its Modifications: A Scoping Review.

Taylor G Kreul, Haley Kenner, Katja Klosterman, Ritu Bhalerao, Akaash Surendra, Ibtesam Salahuddin, Peter Nakaji

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Taylor G KreulCollege of Medicine, The University of Arizona/Banner University Medical Center Phoenix, Phoenix, USA.
Haley KennerGeneral Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, USA.
Katja KlostermanCollege of Medicine, The University of Arizona/Banner University Medical Center Phoenix, Phoenix, USA.
Ritu BhaleraoCollege of Medicine, The University of Arizona/Banner University Medical Center Phoenix, Phoenix, USA.
Akaash SurendraSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, USA.
Ibtesam SalahuddinCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Rocky Vista University, Parker, USA.
Peter NakajiNeurosurgery, Banner University Medical Center Phoenix, Phoenix, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pterional craniotomy is a widely used approach for anterior and middle fossa pathologies; however, violation of the temporalis muscle may result in cosmetic deformities and functional deficits, including temporal hollowing and frontalis weakness. Over the past decade, multiple surgical modifications have been proposed to minimize these complications. However, no consensus has been reached regarding the optimal technique. We conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-guided review of recent literature evaluating temporalis-preserving or reconstructive approaches in pterional craniotomy. Across 18 studies involving 1,339 patients, both the mini-pterional and osteoplastic techniques were associated with superior cosmetic and functional outcomes compared with the traditional pterional approach, with notable advantages for specific aneurysm locations. These findings highlight the growing emphasis on quality of life after craniotomy and suggest that tailored technique selection may improve patient-centered outcomes.

Indexed as

craniotomy techniquesmini-pterional craniotomypterional craniotomytemporal hollowingtemporalis muscle atrophy

Identifiers

PMID42299220
PMCPMC13265083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.