Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42299214›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Stereopsis Assessment in a Pediatric Population and Its Association With Refractive Error: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Kanishk Singh, Rajesh Pattebahadur, Sagarika Snehi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kanishk SinghOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Nagpur, IND.
Rajesh PattebahadurOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Nagpur, IND.
Sagarika SnehiOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Nagpur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStereopsis is the perception of depth arising from binocular vision and is essential for fine motor skills and overall visual function in children. It has been observed that refractive errors diminish binocular function by causing visual blur and impairing fusion, which results in poor stereopsis. Poor stereoacuity can lead to inferior quality of vision and substandard work performance, especially where good eye-hand coordination and visual motor skills are required. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the level of stereoacuity among children with refractive errors and to determine the prevalence and pattern of subnormal stereopsis in the pediatric population. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care center in Central India from October 2023 to September 2024 after Institutional Ethics Committee approval. A total of 120 children aged 5-17 years with previously diagnosed refractive errors and a history of spectacle use for at least one month were included. Children with strabismus, amblyopia, ocular pathology, or poor cooperation were excluded. All participants underwent detailed ophthalmic evaluation, including visual acuity assessment, slit-lamp examination, fundus evaluation, and refraction (dry and cycloplegic), followed by subjective correction. Stereoacuity was assessed using the Randot stereotest and categorized as normal (10-60 arc seconds), subnormal (61-120 arc seconds), moderate (121-240 arc seconds), and poor (≥241 arc seconds). Anisometropia was defined as an interocular difference of ≥ 1 D spherical or ≥ 1.5 D cylindrical power. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, version 17.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), and associations were tested using the chi-square test, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

resultsThe study included 120 children with a mean age of 11 ± 2.64 years, comprising 65 (54.17%) males and 55 (45.83%) females. The mean stereoacuity was 54.01 ± 32.19 arc seconds. Anisometropia was present in 19 (15.83%) patients. Normal stereopsis was observed in 96.82% of myopic patients, 93.48% of astigmatic patients, and 72.73% of hyperopic patients. Moderate-to-poor stereopsis was predominantly seen in hyperopic individuals (27.27%), whereas only 3.18% of myopes demonstrated subnormal stereopsis, with none showing moderate or severe impairment. Hypermetropic children had significantly poorer stereopsis compared to myopes. Anisometropia was associated with reduced stereopsis. Isometropic individuals demonstrated better stereoacuity (48 ± 28.18 arc seconds) compared to anisometropic individuals (60 ± 36.89 arc seconds) (t = 2.31, p = 0.02), indicating a significant impact of on binocular function.

conclusionHypermetropia is associated with poorer stereoacuity compared to myopia, and anisometropia negatively affects stereopsis when compared to isometropia. These findings highlight the importance of early detection and appropriate correction of refractive errors in children to prevent impairment of binocular vision. Routine screening of stereopsis should be incorporated into pediatric ophthalmic evaluation to ensure optimal visual development.

Indexed as

anisometropiabinocular visionisometropiarefractive errorstereopsis

Identifiers

PMID42299214
PMCPMC13264704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.