ArticleCureus2026
Improving the Timeliness and Quality of Electrocardiogram Acquisition, Interpretation, and Documentation in the Emergency Department: A Closed-Loop Quality Improvement Study at Hasahesa Teaching Hospital, Sudan.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Timely acquisition and accurate interpretation of electrocardiograms (ECGs) are essential for the early diagnosis and management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in emergency departments (EDs). Delays in ECG performance and deficiencies in documentation can compromise patient outcomes and quality of care, particularly in resource-limited settings. Objective This study aims to evaluate and improve the timeliness of ECG acquisition, interpretation, and documentation in the ED through a structured quality improvement approach. Methods A closed-loop quality improvement project was conducted at Hasahesa Teaching Hospital, Sudan, using a two-cycle clinical audit design structured around the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) framework. Data were collected prospectively over two audit cycles using a total population sampling approach. The first cycle was conducted over three months from June to August 2025 and included 90 patients. Following a two-month intervention phase, a second cycle was conducted over three months and included 105 patients, yielding a total of 195 cases. Key parameters assessed included time from arrival to ECG acquisition, time to interpretation and documentation, clinical indication, and completeness of ECG documentation. Targeted interventions included staff education, workflow optimization, and reinforcement of standardized documentation practices. Results The proportion of patients receiving ECG within 10 minutes of arrival increased significantly from 43/90 (47.8%) in the first cycle to 90/105 (85.7%) in the second cycle (p<0.001). The mean time from arrival to ECG acquisition decreased from 25.4 minutes to 4.5 minutes. Significant improvements were observed across all documentation parameters, including ST-segment documentation (25/90 (27.8%) to 91/105 (86.7%)), rhythm (50/90 (55.6%) to 85/105 (81.0%)), and rate (70/90 (77.8%) to 99/105 (94.3%)) (all p<0.01). Documentation of the PR interval, QRS complex, and axis also improved significantly. The proportion of patients diagnosed with ACS, including unstable angina, NSTEMI (non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction), and STEMI, decreased from 33/90 (36.7%) in the first cycle to 20/105 (19.0%) in the second cycle (p=0.007), while normal ECG findings increased, although not statistically significant. Conclusion Targeted quality improvement interventions resulted in significant enhancements in both the timeliness of ECG acquisition and the completeness of ECG documentation. These findings highlight the effectiveness of structured audit cycles and low-cost interventions in improving emergency cardiac care and emphasize the importance of sustained quality improvement efforts to ensure long-term impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.