ArticleCureus2026
Advanced-Stage Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Detected During Colonoscopy in a Rural HIV-Positive Patient: A Case Illustrating Fragmentation of Care and Barriers to Screening.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anal canal is an uncommon malignancy with increasing incidence, particularly among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In rural populations, limited access to specialized screening and fragmented care contribute to delayed diagnosis and advanced-stage presentation. A 58-year-old male patient with a 25-year history of HIV presented with one month of persistent rectal pain, intermittent bleeding, and mass sensation. Physical examination revealed a 5 × 6 cm ulcerated lesion near the anal margin. The patient reported inconsistent adherence to antiretroviral therapy due to transportation barriers and had no prior anorectal screening. Colonoscopy was performed, during which rectal retroflexion revealed an irregular, ulcerated, exophytic lesion with friability and infiltrative features. Biopsies and subsequent examination under anesthesia confirmed anal SCC. Staging demonstrated regional lymph node involvement without distant metastases, consistent with stage IIIA (T3N1M0). The patient was referred to colorectal surgery, radiation oncology, and medical oncology for further treatment. Ultimately, this case highlights how transportation barriers, inconsistent care access, and reliance on multiple geographically separated providers contributed to delayed diagnosis. In resource-limited settings, the lack of high-resolution anoscopy restricts early detection. Although not a primary screening tool, colonoscopy with careful anorectal evaluation may allow for opportunistic detection of malignancy in high-risk individuals. This case underscores the need for improved care integration and expanded access to screening resources among rural communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.