Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42299184›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Publishing Without Borders: Advancing Equity in Scientific Authorship.

Shweta Tanwar, Amit Kumar

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shweta TanwarEpidemiology and Public Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, IND.
Amit KumarMedicine, ESIC (Employees' State Insurance Corporation) Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain underrepresented in global academic publishing despite their substantial contributions to science and public health. Evidence indicates that only a small proportion of articles in leading medical journals originate from LMIC regions that account for the majority of the global population, alongside limited representation in editorial leadership, which remains largely concentrated in high-income countries (HICs). Structural factors, including constrained access to mentorship, limited editorial inclusion, and persistent gender and geographic disparities, continue to restrict equitable participation. These challenges may also influence publication outcomes, contributing to lower acceptance rates, higher desk rejections, and reduced visibility of manuscripts from LMIC authors compared with those from HICs. Although mentorship and capacity-building initiatives have been introduced to address these gaps, their impact remains limited, as many programs operate at a small scale, engage relatively few participants, and lack long-term follow-up for sustained improvements in publication outcomes. Achieving equity in scientific publishing will require sustained structural reform. This includes greater investment in manuscript development, diversification of editorial boards, adoption of equitable authorship practices, and inclusive institutional partnerships between the Global North and South. Journals that adopt inclusive models with minimal financial barriers have a unique opportunity to lead this transformation and contribute to a more representative and just global research ecosystem.

Indexed as

authorshipopen access publishingpublication ethicsscientific collaborationscientific publishing

Identifiers

PMID42299184
PMCPMC13264682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.