Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42299161›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Histopathological and Clinicopathological Correlation of Endoscopic Biopsies of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Lesions.

Shivangi Chauhan, Shalini Yadav, Sonal Gupta, Rajni Choudhary, Rajendra Nigam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shivangi ChauhanPathology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, IND.
Shalini YadavPathology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, IND.
Sonal GuptaPathology, Gandhi Medical College and Hamidia Hospital, Bhopal, IND.
Rajni ChoudharyPathology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, IND.
Rajendra NigamPathology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUpper gastrointestinal (GI) tract disorders are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. While endoscopic examination provides direct visualization of mucosal lesions, histopathological examination remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis, particularly for distinguishing between non-neoplastic and neoplastic conditions.

objectiveThis study aims to correlate clinical and endoscopic findings with histopathological diagnoses and to assess the prevalence of MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at Gandhi Medical College and Associated Hospitals, Bhopal, from May 2023 to October 2024. A total of 100 patients undergoing upper GI endoscopy for various indications were included. Biopsies were taken from lesions in the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum. Tissue samples were routinely processed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Giemsa stain was used to detect

conclusionEndoscopic biopsy is an essential diagnostic tool that correlates strongly with histopathological findings. While endoscopy is effective for initial screening and identifying suspicious growths, histopathology is crucial for confirming malignancy and identifying specific inflammatory conditions, such as

Indexed as

adenocarcinomaclinicopathological correlationendoscopic biopsygastric biopsyhelicobacter pylorihistopathologyneoplastic lesionssquamous cell carcinomaupper gastrointestinal tract

Identifiers

PMID42299161
PMCPMC13264703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.