ArticlePeerJ2026
A transformer-based deep learning algorithm for diagnosing spinal infections on axial non-contrast computed tomography images: a dual-center retrospective study.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal infections are rare but serious conditions requiring timely diagnosis. Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) is widely used and may incidentally reveal spinal abnormalities; however, subtle infectious findings are often missed, especially on axial images without sagittal reconstruction. Objectives: To investigate a deep learning approach for diagnosing primary spinal infections using non-contrast CT images. Methods: This retrospective dual-center study included 157 patients with primary spinal infection. A Swin Transformer model was developed using non-contrast CT slices. Patients from the primary center ( Results: The Swin Transformer model demonstrated excellent per-slice diagnostic performance. In the internal validation set, the model achieved an AUC of 0.979, sensitivity of 96.2%, specificity of 90.5%, and accuracy of 89.4%. In the external cohort, similar results were obtained: AUC 0.989, sensitivity 98.2%, specificity 98.3%, and accuracy 98.3%. The deep learning model significantly outperformed both radiologists in AUC and sensitivity across cohorts (all Conclusions: This Swin Transformer-based deep learning model achieves high diagnostic accuracy for detecting spinal infections on axial non-contrast CT images, with performance comparable to or exceeding that of musculoskeletal radiologists. By enhancing radiologists' sensitivity and reducing reading time, the model shows promise as a clinical decision support tool to reduce missed diagnoses, particularly in emergency or resource-limited settings where magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is unavailable. Its robust performance on external validation supports generalizability and lays the foundation for future multicenter prospective studies and extension to other spinal pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.