Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42299137›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2026

A Nationwide Study on Pretransfusion Testing for 10 Years in Korea Using Health Insurance Review and Assessment Claims Data.

Jae Hyeon Park, Yousun Chung, Dae-Hyun Ko, Hyungsuk Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jae Hyeon ParkDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0261-2185
Yousun ChungDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5197-6340
Dae-Hyun KoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. daehyuni1118@amc.seoul.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9781-0928
Hyungsuk KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0574-9200

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessing pretransfusion testing utilization at medical institutions on a nationwide scale can be challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the status of pretransfusion testing in Korea by analyzing insurance claims data.

methodsWe identified all claims including pretransfusion testing or blood transfusion made between January 2011 and December 2020 from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. ABO/RhD typing, antibody screening and identification, and crossmatching were analyzed according to the hospital type.

resultsA total of 42,968,177 claims from 20,088,744 patients were analyzed. The median ratios of ABO serum typing to cell typing were 1.000 for tertiary hospitals, 0.998 for secondary hospitals, 0.000 for primary hospitals, and 0.000 for clinics (

conclusionThe application of pretransfusion testing considerably differs according to the type of hospital in Korea. Primary hospitals and clinics need education and improvement in practice to pursue safe blood transfusion.

Indexed as

Blood Grouping and CrossmatchingBlood TransfusionABO Blood-Group SystemDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansInsurance, HealthRepublic of KoreaRh-Hr Blood-Group SystemABO Blood-Group SystemRh-Hr Blood-Group SystemAdministrative Claims, HealthcareBig DataBlood Grouping and CrossmatchingBlood Transfusion

Identifiers

PMID42299137
PMCPMC13269814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.