Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42298962›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Are interphylum spiralian relationships resolvable?

Ana Serra Silva, Maximilian J Telford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ana Serra SilvaCentre for Life's Origins and Evolution, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8020-3227
Maximilian J TelfordCentre for Life's Origins and Evolution, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3749-5620

Funding

Leverhulme Trust RPG-2021-433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phyla making up the major animal clade of Spiralia have been clear since the advent of molecular phylogenetics; the relationships between these spiralian phyla have not. The lack of consensus over the relationships between these important animal phyla might be a clue implying their emergence in an explosive radiation. Focussing on the five largest spiralian clades (Annelida, Brachiozoa, Mollusca, Nemertea, and Platyhelminthes) and using two phylogenomic datasets, we have applied site-bootstrapping and taxon-jackknifing to explore this example of taxonomic instability. Analyses of the 105 possible rooted trees relating them showed that interphylum branches are very short. Preference for rooting Spiralia on Platyhelminthes is enhanced by a long-branch artefact. Most analyses on the 15 unrooted trees showed a preference for the same topology but the support for this tree over other solutions was not significant. We conclude that the spiralian phyla emerged in rapid succession resulting in a difficult-to-resolve radiation. The deep history we infer for Spiralia has wide-ranging implications for our interpretation of Cambrian fossils and for the evolution of traits such as biomineralisation, segmentation, and larvae.

Indexed as

InvertebratesPhylogenyAnimalsFossilsevolutionary biologyMetazoaphylogenomicsrapid radiationSpiraliatopology testing

Identifiers

PMID42298962
PMCPMC13271739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.