ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2026
Explainable Temporal Deep Learning for EEG-Based Depression Detection Using Resting-State Brain Dynamics.
Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression is a major mental health disorder, and EEG-based automated detection is emerging as a potential objective diagnostic tool. However, achieving both high accuracy and interpretability remains challenging due to the complex spatiotemporal structure of EEG signals. This study proposes an explainable deep learning framework for depression detection using resting-state EEG data.
methodsA retrospective computational study using deep learning was conducted using EEG data from 122 subjects in the OpenNeuro dataset (ds003478). Based on Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores, participants were classified into control (BDI ≤ 13; n = 76) and depressive (BDI ≥ 20; n = 30) groups; intermediate cases (BDI 14-19; n = 16) were excluded to reduce label ambiguity and construct a high-confidence binary classification framework, although this may reduce applicability to mild or subclinical depression, resulting in a final cohort of 106 subjects. Preprocessing included band-pass filtering (1-40 Hz), 50 Hz notch filtering, Independent Component Analysis, and average referencing. A subject-wise 5-fold cross-validation was applied. A CNN-BiLSTM architecture with an attention mechanism integrated with explainable AI techniques (Grad-CAM and SHAP) was developed.
resultsThe proposed model achieved an accuracy of 89.76%, an F1-score of 89.58%, and an AUC of 0.936. Ablation analysis confirmed the contribution of temporal modeling and attention mechanisms. Explainability analysis using Grad-CAM and SHAP showed that frontal EEG channels were the most influential in classification, consistent with neurophysiological findings.
conclusionThe proposed framework provides an accurate and interpretable method for EEG-based depression detection, supporting applications in computational psychiatry and decision-support systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.