Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42298918›Full record

ArticleSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2026

Noninvasive Diagnosis Revealed a Strong Therapeutic Response and Skin Barrier Changes in Hemoporfin-Mediated Photodynamic Therapy for Port-Wine Stains.

Kai Chen, Jin-Zhao Wu, Yan-Yan Hu, Qian Jiang, Yu-Xin Xia, Jie Chen, Lan Chen, Liu-Qing Chen, Dong-Sheng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kai ChenDepartment of Dermatology, Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2210-9440
Jin-Zhao WuDepartment of Dermatology, Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yan-Yan HuDepartment of Dermatology, Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Qian JiangDepartment of Dermatology, Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yu-Xin XiaDepartment of Dermatology, Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jie ChenDepartment of Dermatology, Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6282-2348
Lan ChenDepartment of Dermatology, Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Liu-Qing ChenDepartment of Dermatology, Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8398-4652
Dong-Sheng LiDepartment of Dermatology, Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

Innovation Groups of the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province 2022CFA037Key Research and Development Program of Hubei Province 2023BCB132Knowledge Innovation Project of Wuhan Science and Technology Bureau 2022020801010524National Natural Science Foundation of China 82203926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNoninvasive skin imaging, such as reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT), has been extensively used to collect objective clinical data and assess the morphological and ultrastructural change of tissue. However, the application of these noninvasive diagnosis techniques for the therapeutic evaluation of hemoporfin-mediated photodynamic therapy (HMME-PDT) in port-wine stains (PWS) has rarely been reported.

objectivesTo explore the clinical efficacy of HMME-PDT for PWS, and assess the application of RCM and OCT in objective assessment of the efficacy of HMME-PDT.

methodsClinical images, RCM findings, and OCT scans were used to evaluate the treatment efficacy. The vascular diameter and density under RCM findings, the vascular density, and depth of OCT scans were used for objective therapeutic evaluation. Skin surface roughness and barrier functions were used to analyze the skin barrier changes.

resultsAfter PDT treatment, the clinical pictures showed excellent improvements, and the RCM findings revealed significantly decreased vascular diameter (100.0 ±2.450 vs. 59.61± 4.021, p<0.05) and density (16.79 ± 0.6568 vs. 10.91 ± 0.8052) in treated areas. Moreover, the OCT scans further confirmed the decrease in vascular density and depth, and the skin surface roughness of Ra (arithmetic mean), Rz (the average depth of roughness), Rq (the mean square roughness) and the skin barrier function of transepidermal water loss (TEWL), stratum corneum hydration (SCH), and potential of hydrogen (pH) of these treated areas all were significantly changed (p < 0.05).

conclusionsHMME-PDT is an effective and safe treatment option for PWS patients, and noninvasive diagnosis combined with clinical images are excellent techniques for objectively evaluating efficacy of HMME-PDT.

Indexed as

HematoporphyrinsPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsPort-Wine StainSkinAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeYoung Adulthematoporphyrin monomethyl etherHematoporphyrinsPhotosensitizing Agentsoptical coherence tomography (OCT)photodynamic therapy (PDT)port‐wine stains (PWS)reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM)therapeutic evaluation

Identifiers

PMID42298918
PMCPMC13269836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.