ArticleBritish journal of haematology2026
Improvements over time in survival after post-transplant relapse of adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma and trends of salvage therapy in a real-world experience.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) offers potentially curative outcomes for adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma (ATL), but post-transplant refractory/relapsed (R/R) ATL is associated with poor outcomes. Advances have been made in transplant modalities, novel targeted agents and supportive care; however, it remains unclear whether these advances have improved survival outcomes of post-transplant R/R ATL. To clarify changes in survival after post-transplant R/R, we evaluated the survival outcomes in 1146 patients over a 24-year period, using a nationwide database. The period was divided into three groups: 1999-2010 (early period, as reference), 2011-2016 (middle period) and 2017-2022 (late period). In patients with refractory ATL, multivariate analyses showed no significant difference in overall mortality (OM) after post-transplant refractory in the early and middle periods, but a significantly lower OM in the late period than in the early period (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73 [95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.96]). In patients with relapsed ATL, OM after post-transplant relapse was significantly lower in the middle (HR 0.62 [0.48-0.80]) and late periods (HR 0.68 [0.52-0.90]) than in the early period. Thus, recent advances appear to have contributed to increased opportunities for therapeutic interventions, leading to improved survival outcomes in patients with post-transplant R/R ATL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.