Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42298878›Full record

Trial reportEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2026

Trajectory of response to esketamine nasal spray for treatment resistant depression: Findings from ESCAPE-TRD.

Allan H Young, Lucie Bartova, Narcís Cardoner, Koen Demyttenaere, Andrea Fagiolini, Yordan Godinov, José Felipe Golib Dzib, Christian von Holt, Roger S McIntyre, Albino J Oliveira-Maia and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04338321 (A Randomized, Open-label, Rater-Blinded, Active-Controlled, International, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Flexibly Dosed Esketamine Nasal Spray Compared With Quetiapine Extended-Release in Adult and Elderly Participants With Treatment-Resistant Major Depressive Disorder Who Are Continuing a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor/Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04338321 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Open-label, Rater-Blinded, Active-Controlled, International, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Flexibly Dosed Esketamine Nasal Spray Compared With Quetiapine Extended-Release in Adult and Elderly Participants With Treatment-Resistant Major Depressive Disorder Who Are Continuing a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor/Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen-Cilag International NVRan2020 to 2022Enrolled676ConditionsDepressive Disorder, MajorArmsEsketamine 28 mg, Esketamine 56 mg, Esketamine 84 mg, Quetiapine XR 50 mg, Quetiapine XR 100 mg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Allan H Younghttps://ror.org/0220mzb33Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, Department of Psychological Medicine, London, UK.
Lucie BartovaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, https://ror.org/05n3x4p02Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1769-8025
Narcís Cardonerhttps://ror.org/059n1d175Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9633-0888
Koen Demyttenaerehttps://ror.org/05f950310University Psychiatric Centre KULeuven, Campus Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5331-487X
Andrea FagioliniDepartment of Molecular Medicine, https://ror.org/01tevnk56University of Siena School of Medicine, Siena, Italy.
Yordan GodinovJohnson & Johnson, Sofia, Bulgaria.
José Felipe Golib DzibJohnson & Johnson, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0008-9089-8227
Christian von Holthttps://ror.org/023edjq13Johnson & Johnson, Neuss, Germany.
Roger S McIntyreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4733-2523
Albino J Oliveira-Maiahttps://ror.org/03g001n57Champalimaud Research and Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5071-3007
Benoit Rivehttps://ror.org/02g40zn06Johnson & Johnson, Paris, France.
Philip GorwoodUniversité Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1845-3676

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research has demonstrated the positive impact of early remission on disease trajectory for patients with major depressive disorder. However, there is a paucity of literature assessing the response trajectory for patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD). These analyses investigated patient outcome trajectories to Week 32, including the relationship between short- and long-term outcomes with esketamine nasal spray (ESK-NS) treatment and symptom resolution.

methodsESCAPE-TRD (NCT04338321), a randomized, open-label, phase IIIb study, evaluated the efficacy and safety of ESK-NS versus quetiapine extended release (QTP-XR) in patients with TRD. Rater-blinded Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score was used to assess depressive symptoms and the trajectory of patient responses to Week 32. For ESK-NS versus QTP-XR, time to symptom resolution across MADRS items was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analyses.

resultsOf 676 patients, 336 and 340 were randomized to ESK-NS and QTP-XR, respectively. Most ESK-NS-treated patients achieved continuously improved outcomes to Week 32; early response was associated with better long-term outcomes. Among patients who achieved Week 4 response, 89.6% achieved remission at any point from Week 4 to 32; 78.3% of Week 8 responders achieved remission at any point from Week 8 to 32. Greater and earlier symptom resolution was observed with ESK-NS versus QTP-XR across most MADRS items.

conclusionsMost ESK-NS-treated patients with TRD showed continuous improvements over time, with short-term response associated with better long-term outcomes. Long-term improvements were observed even among partial/minimal early responders, reinforcing the value of longer treatment. ESK-NS had a positive impact across the full spectrum of MADRS-assessed symptoms.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantKetamineQuetiapine FumarateAdministration, IntranasalAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasal SpraysTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsEsketamineKetamineNasal SpraysQuetiapine Fumarateesketaminelong-term outcomestrajectory of responsetreatment resistant depression

Identifiers

PMID42298878
PMCPMC13420147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.