Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42298814›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

A Co-Produced Health Literacy Programme for Pregnant Women Whose First Language Is Not English: A Qualitative Study of Women's Experiences.

Madeleine Benton, Ngawai Moss, Ruksana Begum, Gemma Cartwright, Phoebe Baxendale-Smith, Arti Dave, Mandeep Kaler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Madeleine BentonDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0779-6334
Ngawai MossElly Charity, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9369-5072
Ruksana BegumElly Charity, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0009-9042-0300
Gemma CartwrightElly Charity, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-3153-8484
Phoebe Baxendale-SmithDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0000-0159-8997
Arti DaveThe Royal London Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6491-7446
Mandeep KalerThe Royal London Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3065-0904

Funding

Barts CharityElly CharityNational Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR304430North East London Integrated Care Board
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth literacy, the ability to access, understand and use health information to make informed decisions, is a key determinant of maternal and infant health. In the United Kingdom, approximately one-third of the 600,000 babies born annually are to mothers born overseas, many of whom have limited English proficiency. This language barrier contributes significantly to health disparities. To address this, we co-produced a 6-week health literacy course for pregnant women with limited English proficiency in East London. Designed to empower participants, the course aimed to improve their ability to navigate health information and services. Multidisciplinary facilitators co-designed and delivered sessions covering topics such as anatomy, pregnancy, childbirth, postnatal care and medical decision-making, using illustrated materials to enhance understanding. This study aimed to explore the experiences of women who participated in the programme.

methodsSixteen participants took part in qualitative, semi-structured interviews conducted by a qualitative researcher and an interpreter. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsAnalysis resulted in three themes: (1) Reflections on programme content and delivery, (2) enhanced confidence in multiple areas of life and (3) wider social and personal benefits. DISCUSSION: This programme represents the first UK-based, co-produced health literacy initiative tailored specifically for pregnant women with limited English proficiency. Participants reported improved understanding of pregnancy and increased confidence in communicating with healthcare professionals. Importantly, the programme also fostered peer support networks, which contributed to sustained well-being. These findings underscore the potential of health literacy interventions to reduce health inequalities and improve maternal outcomes, particularly when language and community engagement are central to programme design. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This research was co-created with Katie's Team, a Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) Advisory Group in women's health. The project emerged from concerns raised by pregnant women, families, birthing companions and translators about the challenges faced by non-English speaking pregnant women in accessing and understanding healthcare. A working group including four PPI members, a health professional and two medical students helped shape the study. PPI contributors co-designed and facilitated focus groups with 20 recently pregnant women, informing programme content and delivery. PPI members were actively involved in co-developing the course content and lesson planning alongside a multidisciplinary team. Three PPI members received English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) qualifications, two of whom co-delivered the programmeas teachers. PPI members supported participant recruitment, helped contextualise the interpretation of results and co-authored this paper. Findings were shared with PPI contributors for review and reflection. PPI members also took part in two community events to share findings.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyLimited English ProficiencyPregnant PeopleAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLondonPregnancyQualitative Researchhealth literacymaternal healthpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42298814
PMCPMC13269676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.