ArticleAnatomical sciences education2026
Initial word tests contribute to effective human anatomy education.
Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dissection-based education should be improved in response to persistent concerns regarding its quality and the impact on student performance. We hypothesized that a word test implemented during the initial stage of a dissection course would be an effective intervention for dissection-based education, especially for struggling students. From 2013 to 2017, 25 basic line drawings with English anatomical terms were distributed to 640 second-year medical students at Akita University, Japan, for dissection preparation. The word test was designed with anatomical terms and images and was conducted in the second week of dissections; it contained 10 line drawings and asked students to provide 30 English anatomical terms. The scores were returned immediately. Practical examinations were administered at mid-term and on the last day of the course. The word test scores were positively correlated and significantly predicted the practical examination scores. Friedman test rankings for students with low word test scores (< 60%) significantly improved through practical examinations. These positive effects may be attributable to several factors, including the design with anatomical terms and images, early implementation, providing students with appropriate information for dissection preparation, and immediate feedback on scores. The effects are discussed through the lens of adult learning theory. The word test could help learners understand how to study anatomy and motivate them for dissections, and help teachers support struggling students. The word test may be effective for anatomy education in the context of reduced curriculum hours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.