ArticleJournal of fish biology2026
Conservation and management implications of genetic and geometric scale variation in the ancient fish giant featherback (Chitala lopis).
Article in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Giant featherback (Chitala lopis) is an ancient species of freshwater fish considered globally extinct until extant populations were re-discovered in the Sundaland region of Indonesia in 2022. To improve management of the remaining populations, this study used genomic DNA and landmark-based geometric morphometric analyses of fish scales to evaluate whether these approaches can discriminate among phylogenetic clades, sexes and broad habitat ecotypes inhabited by extant C. lopis populations. DNA analyses of 39 specimens from eight rivers provided the first evidence of two phylogenetic clades: (i) those from Central and South Borneo and (ii) those from West Borneo, Riau, South Sumatra and Jambi. Scale morphology was characterised across eight body areas using scale dimensions (relative height and width to standard length and height-to-width ratio), centroid size and Procrustes shape coordinates, with repeated-measures structure accounted for using linear mixed models and Procrustes ANOVA with a randomised residual permutation procedure (RRPP). Scale dimensions and centroid size varied significantly among body areas (all p < 0.001), with lateral and dorsal regions bearing the largest scales and the pectoral region the smallest. Clade membership had a small but significant effect on relative scale height (H/SL; β = -0.44, p = 0.024), with Clade 2 individuals consistently showing lower values than Clade 1, though scale geometry overall showed limited promise as a rapid non-destructive stock discriminator. Both clade and sex had small but significant effects on Procrustes scale shape (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.