Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42298778›Full record

Observational studyBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2026

The Effect of Pessary Insertion on Pelvic Anatomy: A Prospective Observational Study Using Upright MRI.

Annemarie van der Steen, Jaimy A Simmering, Manon Perik, Frank F J Simonis, Frieda van den Noort, Anique T M Grob

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annemarie van der SteenDepartment of Gynecology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8645-7586
Jaimy A SimmeringDepartment of Gynecology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo, the Netherlands.
Manon PerikDepartment of Gynecology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo, the Netherlands.
Frank F J SimonisMagnetic Detection and Imaging (MD&I), TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Frieda van den NoortMulti-Modality Medical Imaging (M3i) Group, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Anique T M GrobDepartment of Gynecology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo, the Netherlands.

Funding

Reggeborgh Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the anatomical effect of pessaries in the upright position in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

designProspective observational cohort study.

settingOutpatient clinic of our gynaecology department. POPULATION: Fifteen POP patients with successful ring-shaped pessary use.

methodsUpright magnetic resonance (MR) images of the pelvis were acquired before, immediately after insertion of their pessaries, and 1 week later.

main outcome measuresDistances from the lowest points of the bladder, cervix, and pessary to the pelvic inclination correction system (PICS) line were measured, as well as the angles of the uterus and pessary relative to the PICS in the midsagittal plane.

resultsPessary insertion lifted the bladder's lowest point from 0.1 cm below to 0.6 cm above the PICS (p = 0.015), but it descended to 0.2 cm above the PICS 1 week later (p = 0.334). The cervix was lifted from 0.0 to 2.5 cm above the PICS (p < 0.001), which persisted after 1 week (p = 0.470). The angle between uterus and PICS increased after insertion from 97

conclusionPessary insertion changes the pelvic organ position and angulation. After an initial lift, the effect on the bladder diminished after 1 week, while for the uterus it remained. This may suggest a role for uterus lift in relieving POP symptoms.

Indexed as

Pelvic Organ ProlapsePelvisPessariesAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedProspective StudiesUterusmagnetic resonance imagingpelvic inclination correction systempelvic organ prolapsepessarytreatmentupright

Identifiers

PMID42298778
PMCPMC13659428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.