ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026
A review of PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors from traditional Chinese medicine: potential and perspective for activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase δ syndrome.
Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase δ syndrome (APDS) is a primary immunodeficiency caused by hyperactivation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, resulting in severe lymphoproliferation, recurrent infections, autoimmunity, and malignancy. However, current therapies, including immunosuppressants and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, are constrained by limited efficacy, high costs, donor scarcity, or adverse effects such as metabolic complications from chronic rapamycin use. In this review, we systematically synthesize preclinical evidence on traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) agents that target the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Our goal is to establish a hypothesis-driven framework for APDS drug discovery. Through a comprehensive PubMed, CNKI, and Wanfang databases up to October 30, 2025, we identified 332 eligible studies, compiling a repository of 5 herbs, 99 extracts, and 56 formulas. These agents, rich in flavonoids, terpenoids, alkaloids, and polysaccharides, exhibit multifaceted pharmacological activities such as antitumor, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effects. Notably, 15 candidates show promise in ameliorating lymphoproliferation, infection, and gastrointestinal dysfunction in disease models with pathophysiological overlap with APDS. However, we emphasize that all current evidence is derived from non-APDS experimental systems; direct validation in patient-derived immune cells or APDS-mutant models remains absent. This review therefore provides a prioritized, evidence-based repository of testable hypotheses and a translational roadmap, advocating for rigorous functional validation, isoform-specific mechanistic dissection, and integration with conventional therapies to bridge the gap between traditional medicine and precision immunotherapy for APDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.