ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2026
Multicenter external validation of the FW-TRIC score for predicting red blood cell transfusion in on-pump cardiac surgery.
Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPerioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion remains common in cardiac surgery and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Accurate preoperative risk prediction is essential for patient blood management. The Fuwai-transfusion risk of on-pump cardiac surgery (FW-TRIC) score was previously developed and internally validated as a tool to estimate transfusion risk. This study aimed to externally validate the FW-TRIC score in a multicenter cohort.
methodsA retrospective multicenter study was conducted across nine cardiovascular centers in China from January to December 2024. Adult patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery were included, while those undergoing transplantation, mechanical circulatory support, or preoperative transfusion were excluded. The discriminative performance of the FW-TRIC score was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and calibration was assessed through linear regression of observed versus predicted transfusion rates.
resultsA total of 3,287 patients met inclusion criteria, with an overall perioperative RBC transfusion rate of 40.1%. The FW-TRIC score demonstrated good discrimination for predicting transfusion, with an AUC of 0.713 (95% CI, 0.696-0.731) and excellent calibration. All individual predictors of FW-TRIC score, including age, sex, NYHA classification, body surface area, previous cardiac surgery, emergency surgery, and surgery type, underperformed the prediction ability of FW-TRIC score (all P < 0.05 for AUC comparison). Performance remained good across all nine centers (AUCs > 0.65). Across all transfusion risk categories in the external validation cohort, the observed transfusion rates compared well with those predicted by the FW-TRIC model.
conclusionsThe FW-TRIC score was externally validated as a robust and generalizable preoperative tool for predicting perioperative RBC transfusion in on-pump cardiac surgery. Its use enables effective transfusion risk stratification and supports personalized patient blood management strategies across diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.