ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026
Refining Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) to enable better phenotype-genotype integration in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) provides a standardised framework for disease-phenotype associations. Given the complexity of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) and the absence of prior evaluations, we aimed to assess the completeness of HPO terms capturing SARD-related phenotypic features and SARD-phenotype associations.
methodsWhole-exome sequencing was performed in 111 individuals from the LEAP (Lupus Extended Autoimmune Phenotype) cohort, a cohort of adult and paediatric SARD patients, who had at least one feature suggestive of a monogenic disease. We evaluated the completeness of HPO annotations relative to documented phenotypic data and SARD diagnoses. We also explored the potential added value of these terms descriptively and by using a phenotype-based genomic tool, Emedgene.
resultsAt least one missing HPO term occurred in 36.9% of our patients. Five patient features could not be mapped to existing HPO terms: anti-chromatin antibody, autoimmune hepatitis, scleroderma renal crisis, shrinking lung syndrome, and tenosynovitis. The HPO term "scleroderma" was misdefined, and six HPO terms did not include six linked SARDs in the respective disease-association section. In a random sample of 10 SARD patients, we also demonstrated that HPO terms affect the gene variant prioritisation on the Emedgene platform.
conclusionsThis is the first study to examine the HPO term coverage in SARDs and assess the potential impact of missing terms. We have proposed to the HPO hub the inclusion of absent or misdefined terms and the addition of missing SARD-HPO term associations. We anticipate that expanding the HPO will enhance our ability to characterise the genetic basis of SARDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.