ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
A distributed analysis approach for pharmacovigilance data from electronic medical records in German university hospitals: the POLAR_MI ETL Pipeline.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe cooperative project "POLypharmacy, drug interActions and Risks" (POLAR_MI) of the Medical Informatics Initiative Germany (MII) aimed at detecting medication-related risks attributed to polymedication in adult patients from German university hospitals. Here, we report technological challenges and solutions to undertake this large-scale multicentre project relying on routine healthcare data stored and processed by the data integration centres, which were recently established at the German university hospitals.
methodsWe developed and implemented a two-step, privacy-preserving, distributed analysis approach to analyse clinical routine healthcare data relying on the internationally balloted MII HL7
resultsUsing an iterative procedure between data integration centres and the cross-institutional analysis team, we overcame many challenges and established the "POLAR_MI ETL Pipeline". These challenges originated from the heterogeneity of the data integration centres and the IT infrastructure of the related university hospitals including their local hospital information system. Applying our pipeline, we analysed data from ten centres on nearly 800,000 encounters from about 500,000 patients.
conclusionsFor the first time within the MII infrastructure, we demonstrated that a project on routine healthcare data is feasible using a distributed analysis approach based on the recently established network of data integration centres in Germany. We describe an approach to obtain a valuable and insightful overview of health risks in routine healthcare and share the related code. Moreover, we propose improvements to the ETL process for future distributed analyses. Finally, our data-related challenges and solutions can be adapted to other healthcare settings (in other countries and initiatives, respectively) as long as data integration centres equivalents and a common data format/model are available.
trial registrationPOLAR_MI was registered on 27/11/2020 in the "HMA-EMA Catalogues of real-world data sources and studies" (EU PAS number: EUPAS36582).
Indexed as
Identifiers
42298626What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.