ArticleBMC health services research2026
Self-management support needs for individuals with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and their next of kin - a qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex, disabling condition with limited evidence-based treatment options. Self-management support is recommended to improve people's coping and quality of life, yet little is known about whether the provided self-management support meet individuals with ME/CFS and their next of kins needs. The aim of this study was to explore the self-management support needs of individuals with ME/CFS and their next of kin, and to identify barriers and facilitators to effective self-management support in order to inform improvements to existing self-management interventions.
methodsWe conducted an exploratory descriptive qualitative study using a combination of semi-structured individual and focus group interviews with a total of 16 participants (12 individuals with ME/CFS and four next of kin) in Norway. Data were analysed thematically within a constructivist framework.
resultsWe identified three main themes. Theme one was named "Individualised and accessible support", focusing on the importance of timing, readiness, and flexible delivery formats (digital, hybrid, modular). The second theme was named "Continuity and validation", emphasising current gaps in follow-up care for individuals with ME/CFS and experiences of stigma. The third main theme was named "The role of peer support and practical strategies", highlighting the value of peer interaction, sharing experiences, and adaptive tools (e.g., pacing, symptom tracking). Overall, the participants described that existing self‑management support was poorly aligned with their physical and cognitive limitations, lacked consistent and structured follow‑up, and often conveyed contradictory guidance on activity management.
conclusionsSelf-management support for individuals with ME/CFS should be integrated into standardised care pathways, delivered in phased and modular formats, and include structured follow-up. Digital and hybrid solutions can enhance accessibility. Including peer-led components and family involvement may foster empowerment and reduce isolation. Training healthcare professionals in ME-sensitive communication and developing national guidelines are critical to improving service quality and reducing stigma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.