ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2026
Voice characteristics of iron and steel workers: an acoustic and self-reported cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOccupational environments with dust, noise, and high vocal demands can adversely impact voice production. Iron and steel workers encounter several environmental risk factors that may impair vocal function, nevertheless, objective acoustic and self-reported voice outcomes in this population have not been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the acoustic and self-reported voice characteristics of iron and steel manufacturing workers and compare these findings with those of a normophonic control group.
methodsThis cross-sectional comparative research comprised 128 male participants: 64 steel and iron factory workers and 64 normophonic controls. Voice evaluation consisted of F0, jitter, shimmer, noise-to-harmonics ratio, smoothed cepstral peak prominence, Acoustic Voice Quality Index, maximum phonation time, Voice Handicap Index-10 and Voice-Related Quality of Life. Mann-Whitney U tests or Welch's t-tests were used for between-group comparisons, as appropriate.
resultsIron and steel workers had significantly lower F0 and smoothed cepstral peak prominence values and higher jitter, shimmer, noise-to-harmonics ratio, and Acoustic Voice Quality Index scores than controls (all p < 0.01). The maximum phonation time was significantly shorter in workers (p < 0.001). The mean Voice Handicap Index-10 score among workers exceeded the Turkish threshold, and the Voice-Related Quality of Life scores were significantly lower than those of controls (p < 0.001).
conclusionsIron and steel industry workers had lower acoustic and self-reported markers of voice quality than normophonic individuals. These findings indicate that exposure to industrial noise and airborne irritants may be associated with subclinical changes in voice characteristics. In occupational health, a comprehensive voice assessment can serve as a time-saving, non-invasive screening tool to support early diagnosis and prevention of work-related voice problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.