Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42298589›Full record

ArticlePatient safety in surgery2026

Challenges for implementation of "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery" (ERAS) protocols and artificial intelligence support tools in resource-limited countries.

Abdullahi Hassan Elmi

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Patient safety in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abdullahi Hassan ElmiDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Dr. Sumait Hospital, SIMAD University, Mogadishu, Somalia. aarrkaa@simad.edu.so.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5038-8017

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical patient safety remains a major challenge in resource-limited settings, where preventable harm may be increased by delayed assessment, limited monitoring, workforce shortages, weak documentation, and inconsistent use of standardized perioperative protocols. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery offers an evidence-based pathway for improving perioperative care, while artificial intelligence may support risk prediction, complication surveillance, audit feedback, and clinical decision-making. This correspondence argues that artificial intelligence and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery should be considered complementary patient safety strategies rather than separate innovations. In low-resource surgical systems, their combined use may strengthen perioperative reliability, improve early recognition of risk, and support continuous quality improvement. However, implementation must be gradual, locally adapted, ethically governed, and built on essential safety practices such as checklist adherence, multidisciplinary teamwork, staff training, and audit.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceEnhanced recovery after surgeryPatient safetyPerioperative careResource-limited settingsSurgical safety

Identifiers

PMID42298589
PMCPMC13267593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.