ArticleBMC medical education2026
Teaching at scale: a mixed-methods study of team-based learning analytics to enable early support in medical education.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical schools are under increasing pressure to teach larger cohorts while maintaining an excellent student experience. The University of Manchester replaced Problem-Based Learning (PBL) with Team-Based Learning (TBL) in 2023 to meet growing demand for medical education. While the educational effectiveness of TBL is well established, this study evaluated how the routine data generated within large-scale TBL could be potentially used to support early intervention, monitor curriculum quality, and validate peer assessment processes.
methodsWe conducted a prospective mixed-methods evaluation of two consecutive Year-1 medical cohorts at a large UK medical school (2023-24, n = 435; 2024-25, n = 426). Data included TBL individual readiness assurance test (iRAT) scores, student experience surveys, operational measures, and end-of-semester examination results. In the second year, the 50 lowest-performing students after four teaching themes were identified using iRAT data and offered tailored academic and wellbeing support through their academic advisors.
resultsTBL maintained high student satisfaction (74% rated sessions "excellent") whilst simultaneously reducing weekly staff facilitator hours by 63% (160 h vs. 59 h) and room use by 84% (80 h of bookings vs. 13). Student individual weekly performance, as measured by iRAT scores, was strongly predictive of summative performance (R²≈0.38-0.41) and this finding is reproducible over consecutive years. Theme-level variation in iRAT performance also identified differences in content difficulty and alignment, providing a programme-level indicator of curriculum quality and areas of weaker delivery. Early identification and intervention of struggling students increased semester performance by 20% (p < 0.0001) among the bottom 50 students, improved summative exam marks by 5%, and reduced exam failure rate by 41%, without inflating whole cohort attainment.
conclusionsThis study shows how routine TBL data can function as a scalable analytics system to support early intervention, continuous curriculum monitoring, and quality assurance of peer assessment, while also reducing operational demands. These findings provide a transferable model for institutions seeking to expand capacity while maintaining educational quality and equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.