SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2026
Performance and clinical utility of image-based machine learning models for the diagnosis of neglected tropical diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeglected tropical diseases (NTDs) disproportionately affect populations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where diagnostic capacity is often limited. Image-based machine learning (ML) has emerged as a potential tool to support diagnosis, but its clinical utility remains unclear.
aimTo systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of image-based machine learning models for NTD diagnosis in LMICs.
methodsThis review was registered on PROSPERO and conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore from January 2010 up until January 31st, 2026. Peer-reviewed primary studies evaluating image-based ML models for NTD diagnosis in LMICs and reporting diagnostic performance metrics were included. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2, and findings were synthesised narratively.
resultsEight studies met the inclusion criteria. Microscopy-based ML models demonstrated consistently high performance, with reported sensitivities and specificities frequently above 90%, particularly for malaria and helminth infections. Clinical image-based models for skin NTDs showed more variable accuracy. External validation and implementation evaluation were inconsistently reported, limiting generalisability and clinical applicability.
conclusionImage-based ML models show strong diagnostic potential for NTDs in LMICs, especially in microscopy-supported workflows. However, translation into routine practice is constrained by limited dataset representativeness, inadequate external validation, and insufficient attention to operational feasibility and explainability. Future research must prioritise implementation-oriented evaluation to realise public health impact. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable. PROSPERO: CRD420261339435.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.